Back to Blog
high SEVERITY6 min read

Plaintext OAuth Token Storage: A Silent Security Risk in Your Application

A medium-severity vulnerability was discovered where OAuth tokens and API keys were stored in plaintext on the local filesystem without encryption. Despite having PBKDF2 cryptographic capabilities available in the application's dependencies, these sensitive credentials were written directly to disk, exposing users to potential credential theft and unauthorized account access.

O
By Orbis AppSec
•Technically reviewed by Anupam Mediratta•Published March 28, 2026•Reviewed June 3, 2026

Answer Summary

This vulnerability is a plaintext credential storage issue (CWE-312) where OAuth tokens and API keys were written directly to disk without encryption, despite PBKDF2 cryptographic utilities being available in the application's dependency tree. An attacker with local filesystem read access — through malware, a compromised process, or physical access — could steal these credentials and gain full unauthorized access to any connected accounts. The fix encrypts credentials at rest using PBKDF2 key derivation before writing them to disk, and decrypts them transparently on read. Developers should audit any file-based token caching code to ensure sensitive values are never stored in plaintext.

Vulnerability at a Glance

cweCWE-312
fixEncrypt credentials using PBKDF2 key derivation before writing to disk; decrypt transparently on read
riskCredential theft enabling full account takeover for any user whose token file is readable
languageN/A (filesystem credential caching pattern)
root causeSensitive credentials written directly to disk without invoking available PBKDF2 encryption utilities
vulnerabilityPlaintext OAuth Token and API Key Storage

Introduction

Authentication credentials are the keys to your digital kingdom. When OAuth tokens and API keys are stored insecurely, you're essentially leaving those keys under the doormat. This vulnerability, recently patched in a popular application's authentication module, highlights a critical but often overlooked security concern: how we store sensitive credentials matters just as much as how we transmit them.

Developers frequently focus on securing credentials in transit using HTTPS and TLS, but forget that credentials at rest require equal protection. This oversight can turn a user's local machine into a treasure trove for attackers, malware, or even curious insiders.

The Vulnerability Explained

What Was Happening?

The vulnerability existed in the OAuth2 authentication plugin, specifically in the store.ts file's getToken and setToken functions. These functions were responsible for persisting OAuth tokens and API keys to the local filesystem—but they were doing so in plaintext.

Here's what the vulnerable code pattern looked like:

// Vulnerable code pattern (simplified)
function setToken(token: string, apiKey: string) {
  // Writing credentials directly to filesystem
  fs.writeFileSync('credentials.json', JSON.stringify({
    oauth_token: token,
    api_key: apiKey
  }));
}

function getToken() {
  // Reading plaintext credentials
  const data = fs.readFileSync('credentials.json', 'utf-8');
  return JSON.parse(data);
}

The Real Problem

The irony? The application already had PBKDF2 (Password-Based Key Derivation Function 2) available in its Rust dependencies at src-tauri/Cargo.lock:3809. This cryptographic function was sitting unused while sensitive credentials were being written to disk in a format anyone could read.

How Could This Be Exploited?

Let's walk through a realistic attack scenario:

Scenario: The Malicious Browser Extension

  1. Initial Access: A user installs a seemingly innocent browser extension or downloads malware disguised as legitimate software
  2. File System Scanning: The malicious code scans common application data directories for configuration files
  3. Credential Harvesting: It discovers the plaintext credentials file and exfiltrates the OAuth tokens and API keys
  4. Account Takeover: The attacker uses these tokens to:
    - Access the victim's account without needing their password
    - Make API calls on behalf of the user
    - Access sensitive data or resources
    - Potentially pivot to other connected services

Additional Attack Vectors:

  • Physical Access: Someone with temporary physical access to an unlocked computer could copy credential files
  • Backup Exposure: Plaintext credentials in cloud-synced folders or backups become accessible to anyone who compromises those services
  • Insider Threats: System administrators or other users with file system access could harvest credentials
  • Ransomware Exfiltration: Modern ransomware often exfiltrates data before encryption—plaintext credentials are prime targets

Real-World Impact

The severity rating of "medium" might seem modest, but the impact can be severe:

  • Immediate Account Compromise: No password cracking needed—tokens provide direct access
  • Lateral Movement: OAuth tokens often grant access to multiple services and APIs
  • Long-lived Tokens: Many OAuth implementations use long-lived refresh tokens, extending the window of vulnerability
  • Compliance Violations: Plaintext credential storage violates PCI DSS, GDPR, SOC 2, and other security standards

The Fix

What Changed?

The fix involved implementing proper encryption for stored credentials using the already-available PBKDF2 cryptographic function. Here's what a secure implementation looks like:

// Secure implementation (example)
import { pbkdf2Sync, randomBytes, createCipheriv, createDecipheriv } from 'crypto';

const ALGORITHM = 'aes-256-gcm';
const SALT_LENGTH = 32;
const KEY_LENGTH = 32;
const IV_LENGTH = 16;
const TAG_LENGTH = 16;

function deriveKey(password: string, salt: Buffer): Buffer {
  // Use PBKDF2 to derive encryption key
  return pbkdf2Sync(password, salt, 100000, KEY_LENGTH, 'sha256');
}

function setToken(token: string, apiKey: string, masterPassword: string) {
  const salt = randomBytes(SALT_LENGTH);
  const iv = randomBytes(IV_LENGTH);
  const key = deriveKey(masterPassword, salt);

  const cipher = createCipheriv(ALGORITHM, key, iv);

  const credentials = JSON.stringify({
    oauth_token: token,
    api_key: apiKey
  });

  let encrypted = cipher.update(credentials, 'utf8', 'hex');
  encrypted += cipher.final('hex');

  const authTag = cipher.getAuthTag();

  // Store salt, IV, auth tag, and encrypted data
  const secureData = {
    salt: salt.toString('hex'),
    iv: iv.toString('hex'),
    authTag: authTag.toString('hex'),
    encrypted: encrypted
  };

  fs.writeFileSync('credentials.enc', JSON.stringify(secureData));
}

function getToken(masterPassword: string) {
  const data = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync('credentials.enc', 'utf-8'));

  const salt = Buffer.from(data.salt, 'hex');
  const iv = Buffer.from(data.iv, 'hex');
  const authTag = Buffer.from(data.authTag, 'hex');
  const key = deriveKey(masterPassword, salt);

  const decipher = createDecipheriv(ALGORITHM, key, iv);
  decipher.setAuthTag(authTag);

  let decrypted = decipher.update(data.encrypted, 'hex', 'utf8');
  decrypted += decipher.final('utf8');

  return JSON.parse(decrypted);
}

Security Improvements

The fix provides multiple layers of security:

  1. PBKDF2 Key Derivation: Transforms a master password into a strong encryption key using 100,000 iterations, making brute-force attacks computationally expensive

  2. AES-256-GCM Encryption: Uses authenticated encryption to protect both confidentiality and integrity of stored credentials

  3. Unique Salts and IVs: Each encryption operation uses random salt and initialization vectors, preventing rainbow table attacks

  4. Authentication Tags: GCM mode provides built-in authentication, detecting any tampering with encrypted data

Conclusion

The discovery and remediation of this plaintext credential storage vulnerability serves as an important reminder: security is not just about what you build, but how you build it. Having cryptographic capabilities available in your dependencies means nothing if they're not properly utilized.

Key takeaways for developers:

  1. Always encrypt sensitive data at rest, not just in transit
  2. Leverage existing security libraries rather than rolling your own crypto
  3. Use operating system credential managers when available
  4. Implement defense in depth with multiple security layers
  5. Regular security audits can catch these issues before they're exploited

Remember, every plaintext credential is a potential breach waiting to happen. The few extra lines of code to implement proper encryption could save your users—and your organization—from a devastating security incident.

Stay secure, encrypt your secrets, and always assume that local storage is accessible to attackers. Your users' security depends on it.


Have you found similar vulnerabilities in your codebase? Share your experiences and lessons learned in the comments below. And remember: when in doubt, encrypt!

Prevention and further reading

Related Articles

medium

path-to-regexp 0.1.12 DoS: Catastrophic Backtracking on Malformed URL

path-to-regexp version 0.1.12 contains a regular expression engine vulnerability where maliciously crafted URL parameters trigger exponential backtracking, causing CPU exhaustion and service unavailability. Upgrading to version 0.1.13 eliminates the vulnerable pattern from the parsing logic.

critical

CVE-2026-59873: node-tar 7.5.11 DoS via Crafted Gzip Bomb

node-tar versions 7.5.11 through 7.5.18 are vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack through maliciously crafted gzip archives that decompress to disproportionately large sizes. An attacker can exploit this to exhaust memory and CPU resources by submitting a small, highly compressed archive that expands beyond configured limits during extraction.

high

MapManager.get() Race Condition Duplicates API Requests

The MapManager's `get(mapUid, cache)` method used a check-then-act pattern that permitted multiple concurrent requests to pass the cache miss check simultaneously, triggering redundant API calls and risking cache corruption. The fix introduces a `_pending` promise map to deduplicate in-flight fetches for identical map UIDs.

critical

Lampa Desktop Auto-Update Heuristic Bypass: Execution of Unverified

Lampa Desktop's auto-update mechanism downloaded JavaScript and CSS from `raw.githubusercontent.com` using only heuristic validation—file size thresholds and string pattern matching—that attackers could trivially satisfy. The fix introduces cryptographic integrity verification by cross-referencing Git blob hashes from the GitHub Contents API, ensuring downloaded code matches the repository's authoritative state before execution.

high

adm-zip 0.6.0 Preserves SUID Bits From ZIPs: CVE-2026-102282

The `adm-zip` dependency resolved to 0.6.0 in this project's dependency tree, a version affected by CVE-2026-102282: during extraction it applies the Unix permission bits stored in each ZIP entry's external file attributes verbatim, including the setuid (`04000`), setgid (`02000`), and sticky bits. An attacker who controls an archive passed to `extractAllTo()` or `extractEntryTo()` can therefore have the extractor create a setuid binary owned by whatever user the extraction process runs as. The

high

requestInput() Type Confusion: NaN and Object Bypass in JavaScript

The `requestInput()` utility function lacked validation on its `type` parameter and failed to handle `NaN` results from float conversions, creating a type confusion weakness. An attacker could supply malformed inputs that propagate unhandled `NaN` values or unexpected object types through the type system. The fix adds explicit guards against `NaN` type parameters and rejects non-primitive type values.